The necessary features for consciousness in prominent physical theories of consciousness that are actually described in terms of physical processes do not exclude panpsychism, the possibility that consciousness is ubiquitous in nature, including in things which aren’t typically considered alive. I’m not claiming panpsychism is true, although this significantly increases my credence in it, and those other theories could still be useful as approximations to judge degrees of consciousness. Overall, I’m skeptical that further progress in theories of consciousness will give us plausible descriptions of physical processes necessary for consciousness that don’t arbitrarily exclude panpsychism, whether or not panpsychism is true.
Recent Posts
- Some problems of the very intuitive evolutionary emergentist paradigm trying to explain consciousness from neurons
- Only mammals and birds are sentient, according to Nick Humphrey
- Consciousness baffles me, but not the Hard Problem
- LLM, DL and generative AI to represent metaphysical hypotheses and theories.
- Decapitation in Rats: Latency to Unconsciousness and the ‘Wave of Death’
Categories
Follow us
Recent Comments
- David Pearce on Longtermism | Qualia Computing on The imperative to abolish suffering: an interview with David Pearce
- El imperativo de abolir el sufrimiento: una entrevista con David Pearce – Sentience Research on The imperative to abolish suffering: an interview with David Pearce
- The imperative to abolish suffering: an interview with David Pearce – Sentience Research on El imperativo de abolir el sufrimiento: una entrevista con David Pearce
- L’approche systématique de la souffrance: Un entretien avec Robert Daoust – Sentience Research on The systematic approach to suffering: an Interview with Robert Daoust
- The systematic approach to suffering: an Interview with Robert Daoust – Sentience Research on L’approche systématique de la souffrance: Un entretien avec Robert Daoust