The necessary features for consciousness in prominent physical theories of consciousness that are actually described in terms of physical processes do not exclude panpsychism, the possibility that consciousness is ubiquitous in nature, including in things which aren’t typically considered alive. Iām not claiming panpsychism is true, although this significantly increases my credence in it, and those other theories could still be useful as approximations to judge degrees of consciousness. Overall, I’m skeptical that further progress in theories of consciousness will give us plausible descriptions of physical processes necessary for consciousness that don’t arbitrarily exclude panpsychism, whether or not panpsychism is true.
Recent Posts
- Jagdish Chandra Bose & plant neurobiology
- Invertebrate sentience: A review of the neuroscientific literature
- Some problems of the very intuitive evolutionary emergentist paradigm trying to explain consciousness from neurons
- Only mammals and birds are sentient, according to Nick Humphrey
- Consciousness baffles me, but not the Hard Problem
Categories
Tags
Follow us
Recent Comments
- – Suffering Abolitionism – About Suffering on The imperative to abolish suffering: an interview with David Pearce
- How To Prepare Yourself For Pet Euthanasia - Cloud 9 Vets on The HHHHHMM (H5M2) Quality of Life Scale
- How To Prepare Yourself For Pet Euthanasia - Cloud 9 Vets : cloud9new on The HHHHHMM (H5M2) Quality of Life Scale
- LLM, DL and generative AI to represent metaphysical hypotheses and theories on LLM, DL and generative AI to represent metaphysical hypotheses and theories.
- Consciousness baffles me, but not the Hard Problem on Consciousness baffles me, but not the Hard Problem